U

 Jurisdictions treat this determination as an issue of fact, [See, e.g., Frontier Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Trigleth, 256 Ark. 101, 505 S.W.2d 516, 517 (Ark. 1974); Rester v. Morrow, 491 So. 2d 204, 209 (Miss. 1986); McCullough v. Bill Swad Chrysler-Plymouth, 5 Ohio St. 3d 181, 5 Ohio B. 398, 449 N.E.2d 1289, 1294 (Ohio 1983).] which 'is made in light of the 'totality of the circumstances' of each particular case, including the number of deficiencies and type of nonconformity and the time and inconvenience spent in downtime and attempts at repair.' Fortin v. Ox-Bow Marina, Inc., 408 Mass. 310, ...