U

The fact that the terms of the agreement are contained in separate documents does not prevent compliance with the Statute of Frauds. To satisfy the Statute of Frauds, the writing 'may comprise several writings that, in combination, supply the essential terms.' Vess Beverages, Inc. v. Paddington Corp., 941 F.2d 651, 654 (8th Cir. 1991) (applying Missouri law). See also Schafer v. Barrier Island Station, Inc., 946 F.2d 1075, 1078 (4th Cir. 1991) ('the statute of frauds may be satisfied by several writings which relate to each other') (applying North Carolina law).