Register to get FREE access

In a 'battle of the forms' case governed by N.Y. U.C.C. § 2-207(2)(b), the party opposing the inclusion of an additional term bears the burden of proving that the term works a material alteration. 


Section 2-207(2)(b) is an exception to the general rule of § 2-207(2) that additional terms become part of a contract between merchants. That general rule is in the nature of a presumption concerning the intent of the contracting parties. Thus if neither party introduced any evidence, the additional term would, by the plain language of § 2-207(2), become part of the contract. To implement that presumption, the burden ...