World Of Boxing LLC v. King

107 F.Supp.3d 265 (2014)

Facts

P's 'lost profits' - i.e., its expectation damages - 'cannot be reasonably quantified.' P instead seeks to recover its reliance damages. P paid $800,000 into an escrow account, of which $250,000 was immediately payable to King. P expended approximately one million dollars in preparation for the bout. These expenses include transportation, lodging, facilities, and promotion. P seeks $1.8 million. D concedes that $536,000 - which represents the portion of the escrow account not immediately payable to King ($550,000), minus legal fees, plus interest - is due to P per the terms of the parties' escrow agreement. P contends the $250,000 that was immediately payable to him upon execution of the Agreement is subject to and governed by the terms of the Agreement, which earmarks the $250,000 as a 'non-refundable' payment to be retained 'whether or not the bout occurs.' D argues that New York law provides for recovery of reasonable, foreseeable, reliance damages, but those damages must be offset by 'any loss that . . . the injured party would have suffered had the contract been performed.' D contends that P would have incurred significant losses even if the bout had gone forward. D argues that P's reliance damages should be capped at the amount of revenue that P could reasonably have expected from the bout, which, if measured in terms of the ticket sales that WOB was forced to refund, is just shy of $100,000. D asks this Court either (1) to enter judgment for P in that amount, plus return of the $536,000 currently being held in escrow, or (2) to deny P's motion on the grounds that parties have a material dispute of fact regarding whether, and to what extent, P would have suffered losses if the bout had occurred.