Wheeler v. Huston

605 P.2d 1339 (1980)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P, a milkman, fell while making a delivery to D, and sued for damages. Ds denied responsibility for the fall, denied that P sustained injury, and claimed that the P was also at fault. P prayed for general damages and special damages of $9,120.25 (lost wages of $6,000 and medical expenses of $3,120.25). The jury returned a special verdict in the form used in comparative fault cases. P was 45 percent at fault, that Ds were 55 percent at fault, and that P's 'total money damages' were $9,120.25, the exact amount of the claimed special damages. The verdict form made no apportionment between special damages and general damages. When queried if they intended to award nothing for general damages, the foreman responded that the jury intended to award medical expenses and lost wages. The court then reinstructed the jury that under the law of the state of Oregon the jury could not award special damages without an award of general damages, and sent out the jury for further deliberations. The jury returned with a verdict which again found Ds 55 percent at fault, P 45 percent at fault, and assessed P's 'total money damages' in the sum of $20,000. Judgment was entered on this verdict. D appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed per curiam. This appeal resulted.