Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
H and W were married in 1989. H and W made a deal that W did not need to have children. As such, they were married under those terms. H then refused to engage in any type of sexual intercourse with W with contraception. This suit was for an annulment of the marriage in that H committed fraud to an essential element of a marriage contract; he possessed a preconceived, uncommunicated determination at the time of the marriage to have children in the face of an express agreement with W not to have children.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co