Van-Go Transport Co., Inc. v. New York City Board Of Education

53 F. Supp. 2d 278 (1999)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P contracted with D to provide services. P employees were required to be certified, and when unions struck P, D refused to grant conditional certifications during a strike. P defaulted on the contract and P sued D for a laundry list of causes one of which was a defamation claim. D moved for summary judgment on P’s defamation claim. The defamation claim arose out of a letter written by Scarpa (D) and mailed to P at P's request. The letter set forth allegations of bribery against Ps. Ps were required to report these allegations of criminal misconduct, as part of D's bidding requirements. The subsequent report by P was then incorporated into the City's Vendex system, which resulted in the allegations of misconduct appearing in every bid for a D contract submitted by Ps.