United States v. O'brien

391 U.S. 367 (1968)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

O'Brien (D) publicly burned his draft card. This violated the Universal Military Training and Service Act. D claimed that his burning was intended to influence other people to adopt his anti-war beliefs. D argued that the 1965 Amendment prohibiting the knowing destruction or mutilation of certificates was unconstitutional because it was enacted to abridge free speech, and because it served no legitimate legislative purpose. The District Court held that the statute, on its face, did not abridge First Amendment rights, that the court was not competent to inquire into the motives of Congress in enacting the 1965 Amendment, and that the Amendment was a reasonable exercise of the power of Congress to raise armies. The Court of Appeals held the 1965 Amendment unconstitutional as a law abridging freedom of speech. The Court of Appeals was of the opinion that conduct punishable under the 1965 Amendment was already punishable under a nonpossession regulation, and consequently, the Amendment served no valid purpose. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.