United States v. Danzey

594 F.2d 905 (2d. Cir. 1979)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Gore (D) had used trademark methods while committing robberies. There were three witnesses to a bank robbery who observed the methods of the robber. D was charged with the crime due to the similarities to his already admitted methods. D objected to the admission of his statements regarding his methods. He claimed that this evidence was prejudicial, not probative.