United States v. Biggins

551 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1977)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Lydes was a confidential informant for the DEA. Lydes met Biggins (D) at a bar and discussed the possibility of obtaining narcotics. Lydes was told to contact, D through Bertha Coudgo. Lydes went to Coudgo's apartment and purchased narcotics. D eventually agreed to sell one ounce of heroin for $1,600 at Lydes's apartment later on May 30, 1975. Lydes's apartment was monitored by means of electronic surveillance from across the street. D was recorded selling heroin to Lydes. The government introduced the original tape recording of the conversation and a rerecorded original tape, ostensibly filtered for noise. D objected to introduction of the tapes as the Government failed to prove the competency of the operator, failed to establish the accuracy of the recording, and failed to identify a voice on the tape as that of D. D was convicted and appealed.