Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
In 2000, Davis County citizens voted on an opinion question that asked, 'Should fluoride be added to the public water supplies within Davis County?' The addition of fluoride was approved 52 to 48. Those opposed to fluoridation sought to have a revote on the issue, circulating a petition among voters so that the identical opinion question from the 2000 general election would be on the ballot during the 2002 general election. P, a nonprofit corporation organized to advocate for the public health benefits of fluoridation, questioned the constitutionality of placing the revote question on the 2002 ballot. It sought a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against D. The district court found in favor of P and against D. P motioned for an award of attorney fees pursuant to the private attorney general doctrine, which the district court denied.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co