Turner v. Murray

476 U.S. 28 (1986)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

D entered a jewelry store armed with a sawed-off shotgun. He demanded that the proprietor, W. Jack Smith, Jr., put jewelry and money from the cash register into some jewelry bags. Smith complied with D's demand, but triggered a silent alarm, alerting the Police Department. When Alan Bain, a police officer, arrived to inquire about the alarm, D surprised him and forced him to surrender his revolver. D then became agitated. He fired toward the rear wall of the store and stated that if he saw or heard any more police officers, he was going to start killing those in the store. When a police siren sounded, D walked to where Smith was stationed behind a counter and without warning shot him in the head with Bain's pistol, wounding Smith and causing him to slump incapacitated to the floor. Officer Bain attempted to calm D, promising to take him anywhere he wanted to go and asking him not to shoot again. D fired two pistol shots into Smith's chest, fatally wounding him. As D turned away from shooting Smith, Bain was able to disarm him and place him under arrest. D was indicted on charges of capital murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a murder, and possession of a sawed-off shotgun in the commission of a robbery. D's counsel submitted to the trial judge a list of proposed questions, including a question whether the fact that D was a Negro and Smith was a white would prejudice you against D. The judge declined to ask this question. The jury that was empaneled, which consisted of eight whites and four blacks. D was convicted on all of the charges against him. After a separate sentencing hearing on the capital charge, the jury recommended that petitioner be sentenced to death, a recommendation the trial judge accepted. D appealed. D argued that the trial judge deprived him of his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury by refusing to question prospective jurors on racial prejudice. The Virginia Supreme Court rejected this argument. D then sought habeas corpus relief. It was denied, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Fourth Circuit's decision that D was not constitutionally entitled to have potential jurors questioned concerning racial prejudice.