Thieme v. Aucoin-Thieme

151 A.3d 545 (2016)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

In 1999, Michael J. Thieme (P) began employment at a biometrics consulting firm, IBG. He worked over ninety hours a week and frequently traveled for his job. In late 2000 or early 2001, Thieme met Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme (d). In May 2002, D discovered that she was pregnant, and P and D began to cohabitate. Their daughter was born in January 2003. The firm where P worked offered to compensate him for his contributions in the event that they sold the firm. P and D agreed that D would care for their daughter, maintain their residence, and manage their rental properties while P would work. They were not a happy couple. Eventually, in 2010, P and D wed. They filed for divorce fourteen months later. P restated his view that D would be entitled to a portion of any bonus he received upon the sale of the firm. P and D executed their Property Settlement Agreement. Three months later the firm was sold, and P was offered a one-time Closing Bonus of $2,250,000. D first learned of the Bonus when P deposited $200,000 into a bank account that had remained a joint account despite the divorce. D withdrew the deposited funds. P filed a complaint. The judge determined that D was entitled to thirty percent of the post-tax portion of the Bonus earned during their fourteen-month marriage. The court awarded $30,288, to D and ordered her to return the remaining amount that she had withdrawn from the joint account, totaling $169,712, to P. D appealed. The court affirmed, and D appealed again.