Stewart v. Cendant Mobility Services Corp.

837 A.2d 736 (2003)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P and her husband were employed by D. P worked in the sales division and was considered one of the top producers in the relocation services industry. P's husband was an executive in the operations division at D. D underwent a major corporate reorganization. The husband lost his job. P held the position of vice president of sales. P spoke with D's executive vice president of sales, Simon, about her husband's termination and his desire to become hired by a competitor and if that would affect her status at D. Simon told P that she should not be concerned and that her husband's reemployment in the relocation services business would have no bearing on her employment with D. Simon further represented to the P that Kevin Kelleher, D's president and chief executive officer, also wished to assure P that she had no reason to be concerned about her continued status as a highly valued employee in the event that her husband were to become associated with a competitor. On these assurances, P continued in her position with D and did not pursue other employment opportunities. D learned that P's husband was performing consulting services for a competing firm. D then reduced P's duties and limited her interaction with clients. D also requested that P verbally agree to the provisions of a document drafted by D that purported to delineate her obligations to D in relation to her husband's work on behalf of any competitor of D. D terminated P's employment when she declined to agree to the provisions of that document. P sued D for breach of an oral contract, violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligence misrepresentation, and promissory estoppel. D got the verdict on the breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. P got a verdict of $850,000 for promissory estoppel and negligent misrepresentation. D appealed.