Siegel v. Siegel

574 A.2d 54 (1990)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Defendant's gambling debts were evidenced by a note from him to a closely held corporation in which he was an equal one-third shareholder. The alleged losses were sustained when the marriage had already deteriorated to the terminal level and the note was executed 10 days after the complaint for divorce was filed, the note has never been called and then D with full knowledge forged a joint tax return after such a return was ordered not to be done by the court.