Schweiter v. Halsey

359 P.2d 821 (1961)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Halsey (D) and his wife owned a farm subject to a mortgage. They listed the land for sale with real estate brokers. The brokers showed the property to Schweiter (P) who only wanted to purchase the tillable land. D was agreeable to selling that portion of the land but had no legal description for it. The brokers informed P that the mortgagee was willing to increase the amount of the mortgage to $50,000 at 6%. On October 23, 1956, an earnest money receipt was executed, but there was no legal description of the property attached to the receipt. Several weeks later a legal description of the tillable land was attached, and everyone was notified of that fact. P’s loan was approved, and D then asked that the closing be delayed until the New Year for tax reasons. P executed the deed, but D notified P that his wife refused to sign the papers. On January 11, 1957, P gave notice of rescission and D promptly tendered performance, which was refused by P. P then instituted this action for a declaration of rights under the earnest money agreement. Shortly thereafter, D sold the tillable land to a third party for $7,000 less than P had agreed to pay for it. D filed a cross-complaint to recover the $7,000 plus other special damages. The trial court held that the earnest agreement was void, as there was no legal description of the real estate involved in the transaction. P got the judgment for $5,000, and D appealed.