Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company

444 A.2d 647 (1982)

Facts

On November 12, 1975, Ps allegedly lost certain items of personal property in an internal heater explosion. Ps notified D of the loss on November 15, 1975, and on November 28, 1975, Ps delivered an accounting of this loss to P. On February 2, 1978, some twenty-six months later, Ps filed a complaint in assumpsit against D, alleging simply that Ps had provided D with a full accounting of their loss and that D had not reimbursed them as required by the insurance policy. D alleged that payment had been refused because appellants had 'failed to prove the losses alleged' and 'failed to adequately prove the damages alleged.' D also contends that Ps' cause of action was barred by the one-year limitation of suit clause contained in the insurance policy. Judgment on the pleadings was entered in favor of D. On reconsideration, Ps alleged that the one-year limitation of suit provision could not bar their suit because D had alleged no prejudice to itself from Ps' two-year delay. The trial court rejected this argument and again entered judgment on the pleadings for D. A unanimous panel of the Superior Court affirmed. Ps appealed.