Salinetro v. Nystrom

341 So.2d 1059 (1977)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Salinetro (P) was in an auto accident and underwent a medical examination for back injuries sustained. Unknown to P, she was pregnant, and neither the treating doctor, Nystrom (D) nor the receptionist or the x-ray technician inquired regarding her last menstrual period. Subsequently, P suspected she was pregnant and was advised to terminate the pregnancy as the fetus would have been damaged from the x-rays. The fetus was dead at the time of the abortion. P sued D for medical malpractice. P sued D for malpractice. Dr. Aldereguia was called as a witness for P, but the trial judge refused to allow him to testify as an expert with respect to whether or not the conduct of D fell below the standard of medical care on the ground that Dr. Aldereguia was a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, not radiology. D moved for a directed verdict on the ground she failed to make a prima facie case of medical malpractice. The trial judge granted the motion and P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.