Rose v. Rose

481 U.S. 619 (1987)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Charlie (H) was a totally disable vet from the Vietnam War. H married Barbara (W) and had two children before their marriage ended in 1983. H income was comprised entirely of benefits received from the Veterans' and Social Security Administration. H received $1,211 in Disability Benefits, $1,806 in Aid and Attendance Benefits, $90 in Dependents' Benefits and $281 in Social Security Disability Benefits. The children received an additional $94 per month in Social Security Children's Insurance Benefits. The court ordered H to pay $800 per month in child support. H paid only $706 as he claimed that the other $94 was from Social Security Children’s' Insurance Benefits. H then refused to pay anything but the $90 in Dependents' benefits and claimed that the court lacked jurisdiction over his other benefits under the Supremacy Clause. The Circuit Court found H in willful contempt and ordered H incarcerated, but a release from contempt was worked out. H challenged the constitutionality of the action, and the State of Tennessee moved for summary judgment. It was issued and affirmed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.