Richert v. Handly Wash. S.Ct.,
53 Wash 2d 121, 330 P. 2d 1079 (1958)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
On remand from Richert I, the trial court found: 1) The parties did not agree or specify a basis for sharing of losses; 2) The parties did not agree whether the claims of one partner take priority over others; 3) Richert's contributions - $26,842; Handly - services worth $17,913.48; 4) Gross receipts - $41,629.83; 5) Disbursements - $43,926.49; 6) Amount paid to Richert - $10,000; Amount withdrawn by Handly - $7,016.88; 7) No agreement on how loss of capital (Richert's $26,842) to be borne and thus cannot be determined. The trial court also found neither party entitled to judgment against the other. This appeal resulted.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co