Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Proctor (D) was charged with keeping a place with the intent of selling alcoholic beverages. This was against state laws. Neither D nor the state alleged that he actually sold liquor at that location. D was convicted. The lower court held that the thought of selling liquor was the same as the crime for selling liquor. D appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co