Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo,565 F.3d 880 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

See Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005) for the facts. On remand, the district court again found the defense of laches persuasive. It held that the seven-year, nine-month 'Romero Delay Period' evinced a lack of diligence on Romero's part. P appealed.