This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Donald Pritchard (P) alleged that his former wife, Zee (D), intercepted and used his telephone conversations by attaching a wiretapping device to the family phone. P claims that the conversations were recorded without his knowledge and consent. The District Court granted D's motion for failure to state a claim as there was interspousal immunity.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.