This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P asserts claims under title 42, section 1983 stemming from the death of her son, while he was incarcerated in the D County Jail. P seeks to compel D to respond to the following discovery request: INTERROGATORY NO. 15: Please identify any written complaints concerning failure to provide medical treatment to inmates at the detention center for the ten years prior to the filing of this action. P argues these records are relevant to her allegations that D had an unconstitutional policy of denial of medical treatment to its prisoners and that Defendant Brandi Saulsberry was negligent in her supervision. D objected on the grounds that 'P's request is overbroad, unreasonably burdensome, not relevant, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.' Further D claims it would have to review all inmate grievances, inmate requests to staff, lawsuits, and Notice of Tort Claims submitted by anyone for the past 10 years, and D objects to doing this. D did present evidence that since May 2011 D has been sued three times to the best of his knowledge for alleged denial of medical treatment. D argues that its response to Interrogatory 15 was responsive because P's request was phrased as 'any written complaints' rather than 'all written complaints.' By requesting 'any written complaints,' P is only requesting some of the written complaints that may exist.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.