Pratte v. Balatsos

113 A.2d 492 (1955)

Facts

P and Larochelle made an agreement that Larochelle would allow P to install a jukebox on his premises for 14.5 years and that P and Larochelle would share the revenue generated at a 60/40 split. The contract recited that it was binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. D purchased the business with knowledge of the contract but decided to remove the jukebox from the premises. P sued D. The trial court issued a temporary injunction but that was dissolved, and the bill was dismissed as the trial court found that D was not bound by the terms of the contract. P appealed.