Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Pinnick (P) was injured in an automobile accident. He claimed that the accident was caused by Cleary (D), who was negligent. P sued D in common law, seeking damages above and beyond what was allowed by the Massachusetts no-fault statute. D used the no-fault statute as an affirmative defense. P then brought a bill in equity to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, claiming that the statute unconstitutionally deprived him of 'his right to full recovery in tort.'
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co