Perrota v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp

98 A.D.2d 1 (1983)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Petitioner (P) is the owner of a building which was rented to Respondent (R) under a written lease for use as an off-track betting parlor. R exercised its option to renew in 1979 and agreed to additional space. Shortly thereafter, P served notice of termination and began a summary proceedings alleging several violations of the lease. P got the judgment. The appeals court reversed; a summary proceeding would not lie for the alleged violations. P then appealed. P claimed that R made alterations to the premises without permission from P, failed to pay an agreed-upon increase in real estate taxes and allowed patrons and employees to park in fire lanes. Neither P's notice of termination nor petition makes reference to R's violation of paragraph one of the contract; failure to pay rent nor do they refer to paragraph 17 of the lease contract.