Penny v. Ass'n Of Apartment Owners Of Hale Kaanapali

776 P.2d 393 (1989)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Penny (P) owned a unit in Hale Kaanapali. Hale Kaanapali Hotel Associates (D) called a special meeting within the condo association for the purposes of amending the Declaration to change common ground to exclusive usage for D. D controlled 76.83% of the votes, and its proposed amendment was approved. P sued to stop the implementation of the amendment as the only way the Declarations could be changed was on 100% approval. D contends that the amendment is merely a change in the use of the common elements and therefore only 13(d)(1) law applies and that it has the 75% of the vote needed for such a change in use.