Pennsylvania v. Dunlap
555 U.S. 964 (2008)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Officer Devlin, Narcotics Strike Force, was working the morning shift involving undercover surveillance. Devlin had five years on the beat and nine months with the Strike Force. He'd made fifteen - twenty drug busts in the neighborhood he was not sitting in. Devlin spotted a lone man on the corner. D approached the lone man and they exchanged words. Cash was handed over, and small objects were handed back. Each man then quickly on his own way. Devlin radioed a description, and Officer Stein picked up D. Sure enough, there were three bags of crack in the guy's pocket. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in a divided decision that the police lacked probable cause to arrest Dunlap (D). It held that a 'single, isolated transaction' in a high-crime area was insufficient to justify the arrest, given that the officer did not actually see the drugs, there was no tip from an informant, and D did not attempt to flee. P appealed
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner