Peacock Construction Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc.
353 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1977).
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Modern Air Conditioning (P) and Overly Manufacturing (P1) subcontracted with Peacock (D), to do the heating/air conditioning and swimming pool work for a condominium project. The written subcontracts provided that D would make final payment to the subcontractors within 30 days of completion, written acceptance by the architect and full payment by the owner. When the subcontractors completed the work, D did not pay them because the owner had not paid in full. P and P1 sued for payment in separate suits. D claimed that payment by the owner was a condition precedent to payment to the subcontractors. The trial judge disagreed and granted summary judgment for both Ps, and the court of appeals affirmed. The state supreme court granted certiorari.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co