Nycal Corporation v. Kpmg Peat Marwick Llp

688 N.E. 2d 1368 (1998)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P was interested in taking a position in Gulf. Gulf provided P with a copy of its 1990 annual report that was prepared by D. Gulf was a public company. P relied on D's report of the financial condition of Gulf and as such then entered into a stock purchase agreement with the controlling shareholders of Gulf. The sale was completed, and less than two years later Gulf declared bankruptcy rendering P's investment worthless. D first learned of the P-Gulf transaction a few days prior to the July 12, 1991 closing. Until that time, D had no knowledge of what had been agreed upon or even contemplated. P sued D seeking damages and costs incurred as a result of its alleged reliance on D's audit report. P claimed that the report materially misrepresented the financial condition of Gulf. The trial judge applied the liability standard under 552 Restatement of Torts and granted summary judgment to D. P appealed.