Nguyen v. Ibp, Inc.

162 F.R.D. 675 (1995)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

D moved in Limine to exclude testimony of P's Proffered Expert Witness. D claims that P has failed to serve a proper disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). A medical report signed by the expert witness and setting forth a summary of his physical examination and medical opinions was provided by Dr. Shechter on or about October 24, 1994. P also supplied an unsigned curriculum vitae and a list of patients about whom Dr. Shechter had given deposition testimony. The client list contact information was incomplete and failed to identify with particularity the cases in which Schechter testified. In discovery, P disclosed that Schechter was being paid $750 for his work and testimony. D argues that P has failed to make the appropriate disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) related to retained expert witnesses. P claims he has fully complied with all disclosures pertaining to his expert witness under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2).