Marx v. Akers

666 N.E.2d 1034 (1996)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P sued IBM under a derivative lawsuit for excessive compensation to executives and directors. P's amended complaint alleged that the board wasted the assets of the corporation. P claimed that during a period of declining profits the director defendants engaged in self-dealing by awarding excessive compensation to 15 of 18 outside directors. D moved to dismiss for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as P failed to serve a demand on the board to initiate a lawsuit. The complaint was dismissed because P did not make demand upon the board that it initiate a lawsuit. The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the complaint did not contain any details from which the futility of the demand could be inferred.