Lipper v. Weslow,

369 S.W.2d 698 (1963)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Sophie Block, age 81, executed a will 22 days before she died that left her estate to her two surviving children. The will specifically disinherited three of her grandchildren who were descendants of a son who had died some years before. The will had been prepared by her son, Lipper (D), who was a lawyer and stood to benefit from an increased share if the grandchildren were excluded. Sophie died, and the three grandchildren charged D with undue influence. They contended that the disinheritance clause was inserted by D because he never liked his deceased brother. It was shown the D lived next door and had a key and easy access to Sophie and that he stood to gain from the exclusion. There was evidence that D bore malice against his brother and that D wrote the will and it was not read to Sophie before she signed it. A jury found that the will was the result of undue influence. D appealed; there was no factual basis for such a finding.