Liddle v. Commissioner

103 T.C. 285 (1994)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P has played the bass viol professionally for over a decade. The viol at issue was built by Francesco Ruggeri (c. 1620-1695). Ruggeri studied stringed instrument construction under Nicolo Amati, who also instructed Antonio Stradivari. P purchased the viol for $28,000 on November 8, 1984; at that time, it was in an excellent state of restoration and had no apparent cracks or other damage. P acquired the viol with the belief that it would serve him throughout his professional career, about 30 to 40 years. P exchanged it for a Domenico Busan 18th-century bass viol (Busan) on May 10, 1991, that was appraised at $65,000 on the date of the exchange. P thought that the 'more vocal' tonal quality of the Busan would appeal to audition committees more than the 'rich, deep' sound of the viol. In 1987, P claimed a deduction for the Ruggeri that had been used in his trade or business. P used it for practice, auditions, rehearsals, and performances with symphony orchestras. That use subjected it to wear and tear that did not reduce its economic value as a collectible. Ps claimed a depreciation deduction of $3,170 and D disallowed this deduction in full, stating in her notice of deficiency that the viol 'in fact will appreciate in value and not depreciate.' P petitioned.