King Vision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. J.C. Dimitri’s Restaurant, Inc.

180 F.R.D. 332 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

Facts

D was sued and filed an answer wherein 30 of the Response's 35 paragraphs plus the incorporation by reference of such earlier paragraphs in contains the following response. Neither admit nor deny the allegations of said Paragraph --, but demand strict proof thereof. The trial judge on his own motion (sua sponte) addressed this response according to the dictates of FRCP 8(b).