In Re The Marriage Of Scheuer v. Scheuer

711 N.W.2d 698 (2006)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

H and W were married July 29, 1978. W petitioned for divorce on April 23, 2003. The couple had two children, but both were adults at the time of the divorce. H had been employed at Andersen Windows for twenty-three years, earning approximately $20 an hour. W was employed at Wood Goods, was earning around $12.70 an hour. On May 6, 2003, the court entered a temporary maintenance order, with H paying W $300 per month. H lost his job in July. W alleged H had been fired for misconduct on the job. H admitted he skipped work for five days in a row, although he asserted he had taken vacation days. H later found a new job paying $11.74 per hour. The trial court imputed an annual earning capacity of $41,875, or $ 20.13 per hour. The court found that had it not been for H's misconduct, H would have been continuing at a rate of at least $20 per hour. Based on the imputed earning capacity, the court ordered H to pay maintenance for fifteen years: $400 per month for the first five years, $500 per month for the second five years, and $600 per month for the third five years. H appealed in part.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.