In Re Marriage Of Hightower

830 N.E.2d 862 (2005)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

H and W were married in 1984 and had a son in 1989. W filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in 2001, listing 'irreconcilable differences' as the ground for dissolution. The parties reached a settlement, which was reduced to writing and signed by both parties and their attorneys. W then informed the trial court that she intended to amend her pleadings to request dissolution on grounds other than those listed in her initial petition. Permission was granted. W then filed for dissolution of marriage, listing adultery as the ground for dissolution. D denied that the parties should be granted dissolution on the ground of adultery because W 'has forgiven and condoned any purported acts of adultery.' At trial, H testified that he and W began marital counseling in 1995. H admitted that he had fathered a child with another woman. H testified that W forgave him for his infidelity and that they resided together as husband and wife, shared the same room, shared domestic duties, and had an intimate relationship until W filed for divorce in May 2001. W testified that H had never told her that he fathered Lauren. W first learned of Lauren's existence in 1995 or 1996 from a private investigator but was unable to confirm that Lauren was H's daughter until April 2001, when she received a copy of the Hamilton County, Ohio, court document. The trial court concluded that H proved the defense of condonation. W appealed.