Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
P is a shareholder of Fidelity Cash Reserves. He sued Fidelity and its investment adviser under 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b), claiming that Fidelity was paying the adviser too large a fee. The district court ruled that P's claim was basically 'equitable,' not 'legal' in nature, and that P was not entitled to a trial before a jury. P sought a writ of mandamus to compel a jury trial.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co