This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Testator directed his executrix to employ either of two named attorneys to represent the estate, and if she failed to do so, she should be replaced by the court. The named executrix declined to serve; the testator's alternative nominee sought to employ counsel of her own choice. The designated attorneys objected. The probate court ignored the attorneys and appointed her, and the court of appeals affirmed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.