Hubler Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation
193 F.R.D. 574 (2000)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Ps sell vehicles manufactured by D. Ps claim that D unlawfully altered its marketing program. Ps authorized D's collection of a one percent charge because D redistributed the money to regional dealer marketing groups (DMGs) for use in local advertising campaigns. D began to retain the monies announcing that it would now spend this money on national advertising. Ps sought disgorgement of illegal benefits that D has derived from its marketing program, treble damages for conversion, and attorney fees. Ps moved for certification of a class defined as all D dealers located in Indiana.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co