Great Lakes Rubber Corp. v. Herbert Cooper Co.

286 F.2d 631 (3d Cir. 1961)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Great Lakes (P) filed an amended complaint against Cooper (D), claiming that D had engaged in unfair competition and unfair business practices. D filed an answer and a counterclaim; it held that P was involved in a conspiracy to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce and that P brought the action for harassment and the elimination of a competitor. P's complaint was based on diversity jurisdiction. The court granted D's motion to dismiss; there was no diversity of citizenship between the parties. Jurisdiction over D's counterclaim was retained; the claim arose under federal law. P filed an answer and counterclaim, which mirrored the allegations of the original amended complaint. D moved to dismiss P's counterclaim; the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. D's motion was granted. P appealed; the court has jurisdiction over the counterclaim because it is a compulsory counterclaim.