Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
D rented a one-family house from P pursuant to a written lease. Despite a notice to vacate, D continued in possession for approximately six and a half months after the expiration of the term of the lease. D moved out, and P sued him, seeking compensation for damage which the tenant had allegedly caused to the property, twice the monthly rent pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:42-6 for the period during which he had remained in the house after the expiration of his lease, and an attorney's fee. D counterclaimed for specific performance or damages. D claimed a breach of his option to purchase the property, and he sought damages for the breach and compensation for the amount by P had been unjustly enriched as the result of improvements made by the D to the property in anticipation of his acquiring it under what he believed was his purchase option. The jury returned a verdict awarding D $13,000 as the reasonable value of improvements. The jury rejected P's claims for D's possession beyond the term of his lease or that the premises had been injured by D's neglect. The jury found that P had not breached his contractual obligation to sell the property to D. P appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co