Estate Of Russell,

69 Cal. 2d 200, 444 P.2d 353, 70 Cal. Rptr. 561 (1968)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Testatrix executed a valid holographic will, leaving the residue of her estate to Quinn (D), and Roxy Russell. Quinn was a friend of testatrix. Roxy Russell was a dog which was alive at the time the will was executed, but which predeceased testatrix. The will provided a specific bequest to testatrix's niece and sole heir at law (P). P claimed that the bequest to the dog was invalid, and that, as testatrix's heir, she was entitled to half of the estate. D was permitted to introduce evidence regarding testatrix's intent to leave her estate to D, and that she intended for D to care for the dog. The probate court found that D was the residual taker under the will, and construed the bequest to the dog as merely reflecting testatrix's intent that D care for the dog.