This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Schlosser (D) entered into a contract with Flynn (P) to purchase a coop apartment. The contract stated that D had to be approved as a tenant in the coop before the apartment could be conveyed. Before the tenant approval, D attempted to revoke her offer. P sued for breach of contract. D alleged that the approval was a condition precedent to the contract and P alleged that it was a condition on performance; a valid contract already existed. Judgment was given to D and P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.