Dodson v. Persell

390 So.2d 704 (1980)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Dodson (P) sued Persell (D) for negligence from an auto accident. P propounded interrogatories to discover whether surveillance had taken place, whether photographs or movies were taken and if so the time and lace and substance of their content. D objected to this discovery and the production of the films or photographs as D claimed they were work product. That objection was upheld by the court. The evidence was admitted at trial over objection. D got the verdict and P appealed. The Appeals court affirmed. P appealed.