Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
D was admitted to the Brethren Healthcare Center ('BHC') because he suffered from memory loss and confusion. The primary diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease. Over the course of three years at BHC, Rusk experienced periods of anxiousness, confusion, depression, disorientation, and agitation. D often resisted when staff members attempted to remove him from prohibited areas of the facility. On several occasions, D was belligerent with both staff and other residents. D was often combative, agitated, and aggressive and would hit staff members when they tried to care for him. BHC employed P as a certified nursing assistant for 20 months prior to this incident. P's responsibilities included caring for D and other patients with Alzheimer's disease. P did not have specialized training on how to care for people with Alzheimer's disease. P knew that D had Alzheimer's disease. On the day in question, P knew that D had been 'very agitated and combative that evening.' P alleged that when she was trying to put D to bed, he was hitting and kicking wildly. She was kicked in the left knee, and hip area and her lower back popped, and she yelled out with pain from my lower back and left knee. P sued D seeking monetary damages. D moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted his motion. P appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding 'that a person's mental capacity, whether that person is a child or an adult, must be factored [into] the determination of whether a legal duty exists.'
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co