Costco Wholesale Corp. v. World Wide Licensing Corp.

75 Wash.App. 637, 898 P.2d 347 (1995)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Worldwide (D) sells jewelry to wholesale buyers. Coleman was D's independent sales representative. Dose is a Worldwide division president. Coleman presented D's merchandise to P and P agreed to purchase 5 pallets of 416 boxes each, for a total of $74,880.00, and paid by check. Coleman had convinced D to make 3 pallets more. In P's opinion, the jewelry it received was poorly packaged, and not the quality it expected. Dose told Coleman to 'approach P with an $8 per box adjustment in price providing they agreed to purchase the remaining 3 pallets at the adjusted price'. Dose claimed Coleman 'indicated' that P 'had agreed to the additional order.' Coleman's declaration asserts that Dose authorized an $8 per unit rebate, but it says nothing about the alleged additional order, or any instruction to make the rebate contingent on a promise to buy the other three pallets. P sent a rebate form to Coleman. Coleman signed it and faxed a copy to D. When P did not order the three additional pallets, D refused to pay the rebate. When D paid Coleman's sales commission, however, it was based on the rebated sales price. P sued seeking $16,640 (2,080 boxes at $8 per box). D denied the rebate agreement and alleged the statute of frauds as an affirmative defense. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of P.