Copeland Process Corp. v. Nalews, Inc
312 A.2d 576 (N.H. 1973)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Copeland (P) subcontracted with Nalews (D) to furnish labor, materials, and services on a contract between P and the town of Lincoln. The contract was mutually rescinded without prejudice when D could not meet its deadlines. The agreement for rescission said nothing about damages for D's breach. P sued D for a breach. P claimed that the rescission had no effect on existing rights and duties and only operated in the future. D argued that the agreement canceled the contract in total. The trial court found for D. P appealed; parol evidence was improperly admitted.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co