This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ps are pharmacies doing business in the State of Wisconsin. D is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois. D manufactures and sells under its own private labels a wide variety of drugs, beauty aids, and household commodities. Prior to October 1, 1980, D sold these products to the consuming public through a nation-wide system of both company-owned and independently-owned stores. Every independently-owned drug store operated under a standard written agreement, which governed all aspects of the contractual relationship between D and Ps including such matters as the right of the independently-owned store to use the D trade name and trademark, D's right to locate a company-owned store near the independently-owned store, and the minimum amount of D products that the retailer must purchase each year. The Retailer's Agreement expressly provided that '(i)n the event D determines at any time to discontinue all similar Agreements, it may, at its option, terminate this agreement upon thirty days' written notice' to Ps. The D-P agreements were not exclusive as Ps could purchase the same types of goods from other suppliers. D decided to discontinue the products on the ground that these independently-owned drug stores were producing an inadequate rate of return. D gave 30 days-notice as required by the agreement. D also furnished Ps’ names and addresses to manufacturers, wholesalers, suppliers, and vendors for the purpose of assisting Ps in finding alternative sources of supply. Ps sued D for damages and injunctive relief under a Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law. D moved for summary judgment.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.